Lewis Saul & Associates, P.C.

Terrible. Lewis Saul is a personal injury attorney who is extremely unethical and only interested in exploiting the legal system for his pecuniary gain. He has an extensive pattern of frivolous litigation without any basis of Law.
Lewis Saul and Associates has brought a frivolous lawsuit against me in Kings County Supreme Court. Lewis used the court as a tool to carry out his self-​serving objectives in my case and at least seven others I have found. He has always known his case against me was baseless and pursued it even when its lack of merit was clear. My lawyers proved to him in writing he had no cause of action before he filed the case. The courts have told him his case was baseless and meritless on at least three occasions. I had to defend myself from an inherently frivolous lawsuit costing me over a hundred thousand dollars to defend, which was dismissed in it’s entirely as «a rambling litany of missed opportunities and other grievances.»
Ultimately, the court dismissed Lewis’s complaint against me. Moreover, in another decision related to sanctions, it noted that the «court’s Dismissal Decision clearly indicates that the plaintiff’s action was frivolous.»
I am not the only person harmed by Lewis’s unethical litigation tactics. Lewis also brought an action against an unrelated man because he wanted to live in a coveted SoHo loft but could not, because under New York law, the loft could only be inhabited by an artist certified by the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs. Undeterred by inconvenient legal hurdles and unburdened by ethics, Saul crafted a sham agreement creating a living arrangement between him and a married, certified artist named Stefan.
The First Department dismissed a lawsuit Saul filed as meritless – going so far as to call it a «sham». Lewis’s arrangement to share a SoHo loft with an unrelated man was only intended to circumvent the legal requirement that the loft be used as joint living and work quarters by a certified artist. The Court’s opinion, cited as Saul v. 476 Broadway Realty
The Court saw through Saul’s charade:
…the arrangement for Saul and Stefan to share the apartment was a sham intended to circumvent the legal requirement that the apartment be used as joint living and work quarters by a certified artist, and the transfer to Saul therefore would have been unlawful even if approved by the cooperative corporation. Defendants’ [the cooperative corporation] moving papers made a compelling prima facie showing that Stefan had no intention of actually moving into the apartment and that the arrangement was therefore a sham, yet plaintiffs did not submit any affidavit by Stefan in opposition to the summary judgment motions.
Lewis also sued the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles and its Commissioner, Barbara Fiala., Lewis was arrested near his home in the Hamptons after drinking and driving. The arresting officer then brought Saul to the police station, where Lewis admitted that the officer notified him — reading from a form — that a refusal to submit to will result in immediate suspension and subsequent revocation of your license. Thousands of dollars of taxpayer money and a court and police officer’s time were wasted on this frivolous case, the Appellate Division denied Lewis’s appeal and his motion to stay the suspension of his license.
Lewis Saul, brought claims against me that that he knew or should have known were meritless. Lewis must be held to higher standards. Lewis is required to be honest in his dealings with every court, and every litigant. He has utterly, disgracefully failed in this regard. He has abused the privilege that comes with a law license. He has filed frivolous litigation and pursued it even when its lack of merit was clear. He has wasted judicial resources engaging in inappropriate, baseless lawsuits victimizing others and myself in attempts to exploit our legal system.